Duncan Lewis’ legal challenge to the Secretary of State for the Home Department’s 24/7 GPS tracking of migrants as a condition of their immigration bail has been granted permission to apply for judicial review on all grounds argued, as per an order of the Hon. Mr Justice Murray on 28 March 2023.
Since August 2021, individuals on immigration bail facing deportation have become subject to Electronic Monitoring, an intrusive form of surveillance which tracks their location on a 24/7 basis and retains all data collected during that time. This has been done through a device which is fitted to the individual’s ankle, and requires charging for a minimum of 2 hours per day. If the device loses its battery, or the individual is found not to be using it correctly, they receive notifications that they have breached their bail conditions and visits to their home from the subcontractors responsible for the device. The consequences of such a breach go as far as being re-detained under immigration powers, as well as potentially constituting a criminal offence punishable by fine or prison sentence. Such intrusive measures directly engage Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which guarantees the right to respect for private and family life.
Four Duncan Lewis clients have brought the challenge together. These clients include survivors of trafficking, modern slavery, domestic violence and FGM, as well as those threatened with removal to Rwanda and one EEA national. Each client instructed that wearing the GPS tracking device caused severe detriment to their mental health. They have felt stigmatised, increasingly confined to their homes, and felt as if their lives are controlled by the Home Office at all times. A joint report by Bail for Immigration Detainees, Medical Justice and Public Law Project has supported these claims, and deemed such measures to be neither necessary nor cost effective.
The challenge has already led to an amendment of Home Office Policy Guidance, and interim relief being granted for a survivor of trafficking and modern slavery in need of accommodation, as well as the removal of the tracking devices for a number of the claimants. However, the following grounds were argued in filling the claim: