Have a question?
033 3772 0409

Reported Case

The Queen on the application of Abbas Mohammadi -V- State for the Home Department [2014] EWHC 2251 (Admin) (9 July 2014)

Date: 09/07/2014
Duncan Lewis, Reported Case Solicitors, The Queen on the application of Abbas Mohammadi -V- State for the Home Department  [2014] EWHC 2251 (Admin)

In the High Court of Justice- Queen’s Bench Division- Administrative Court

This is an application in which the Claimant, a failed asylum seeker, seeks judicial review of the Secretary of State's refusal of a "Fresh Claim" for asylum. Such claims are governed by para 353 of the Immigration Rules which is designed to ensure that failed applicants cannot apply for asylum over and over again without putting forward new material that is significantly different from that already considered.

Permission to apply for judicial review was granted on the 2nd May 2013 by HHJ Thornton QC. Under CPR 54.14 the Defendant had thirty five days from the grant of permission (i.e. until the 7th June 2013) to file her detailed grounds (and written evidence) for contesting the claim. And in granting permission HHJ Thornton QC had so ordered. None the less, the Secretary of State only filed her Detailed Grounds of Defence on the 29th March 2014, about nine months late

Firstly the Defendant argues that because there was new material in relation to one issue that impacted upon credibility that did not mean that the whole assessment of credibility had to be reconsidered. As the Defendant's skeleton argument states: "the short point is this: the absence of the translated documents was but one factor in a multi-factorial assessment by the IJ of the Claimant's case and his credibility".

In the second place, the Defendant argues that even if the new material was taken at its face value (and if it were to be accepted that the Claimant had written the material) fundamental and insuperable difficulties remain. The Defendant is able, for instance, to point to the finding of the immigration judge in regard to the evasiveness of the Claimant under cross examination, inconsistencies in the tale told and the implausibility in the account given of the alleged visit of Iranian security officials (the Etelaat) to his home. These are not undermined by the provision of the translated documents.

The application for judicial review was dismissed.


Find full details of this case on Bailii’s website here.
Call us now on 033 3772 0409 or click here to send online enquiry.
Duncan Lewis is the trading name of Duncan Lewis (Solicitors) Limited. Registered Office is Spencer House, 29 Grove Hill Road, Harrow, HA1 3BN. Company Reg. No. 3718422. VAT Reg. No. 718729013. A list of the company's Directors is displayed at the registered offices address. Authorised and Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority . Offices all across London and in major cities in the UK. ©Duncan Lewis >>Legal Disclaimer, Copyright & Privacy Policy. Duncan Lewis do not accept service by email.